Covernance or Women’s Rights. How Much Room for the Gender Equality Argument In The Swiss Headscarf Debate?

Authors

  • Federica De Rossa
  • Micol Ferrario

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2021.1417

Keywords:

Islamic veil; Muslim women; gender equality; Art. 8 Swiss Federal Constitution; CEDAW

Abstract

Abstract: Covernance o diritti delle donne. Quanto spazio per la parità di genere nel dibattito svizzero sul velo Islamico? – With the popular initiative “Sì al divieto di dissimulare il proprio viso”, in March 2021 a national ban on full-face coverings has been adopted in Switzerland. Prior to this, similar bans already existed in Ticino and San Gallo Cantons. Among the many arguments in their support, stands gender equality. The article explores if and how this argument has been employed in the Swiss headscarf legislative and jurisprudential debate. By considering both the relevant parliamentary debates and the case-law of the Swiss Federal Tribunal, it concludes that, so far, gender equality has never played a truly diriment role in the appreciation of the ban. Thus, the article finally suggests that, if challenged with a proper complaint, there is room for the Swiss judge, in a given case, to declare the ban contrary to the gender equality principle, and this under a harmonised interpretation of the Constitution and/or an interpretation consistent with the CEDAW.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-12

How to Cite

De Rossa, F., & Ferrario, M. (2021). Covernance or Women’s Rights. How Much Room for the Gender Equality Argument In The Swiss Headscarf Debate?. DPCE Online, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2021.1417

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.