Aderenza al testo e interpretazione costituzionale. Riflessioni dalle esperienze australiana e neozelandese
Textualism and constitutional interpretation. Reflections from the Australian and New Zealand experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2024.2307Abstract
Textualism and constitutional interpretation. Reflections from the Australian and New Zealand experiences - A comparative examination on the relationship between written norms and the interpretation given by the courts can bring to attention a multiplicity of experiences. With specific reference to constitutional interpretation, the U.S. system, which has a written constitution as well as a Bill of Rights, the Australian system, which has a constitutional text but no Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, and the New Zealand system, where a constitution is absent, but the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act is present at the same time, will be considered here. In this way, we will ask about the value of the presence or absence of the constitutional text with reference to its literal interpretation.
Keywords: Common law; Constitution; Constitutional interpretation; Originalism; Textualism.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 DPCE Online

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0