Costituzioni pacifiste e tutela umanitaria: i procedimenti deliberativi delle missioni in Italia, Germania e Giappone attraverso il prisma degli organi costituzionali

Pacifist Constitutions and Humanitarian Protection: law-making procedures for missions in Italy, Germany, and Japan through the prism of constitutional bodies

Authors

  • Sara Bagnato
  • Cristina Piccolo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2024.2121

Abstract

This work aims to analyze the constitutions that entered into force after the Second World War, in which it is clearly expressed a mandatory condemnation of war. Specifically, this paper intends to question the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention in the constitutional experience of Italy, Germany, and Japan. Humanitarian intervention indeed, detects as an autonomous category, independent from the traditional concepts of defense or aggression war. On this purpose it is intended to consider the law-making procedures destined to give authorization to missions of humanitarian protection in the above-mentioned legal orders. Therefore, the focus will be set on the sources of law and the involved constitutional bodies to determine in which way humanitarian intervention can be considered in compliance with the constitutional dictate of pacifist clauses.

Keywords: Peace-keeping; Humanitarian protection; Peace-enforcing; Pacifist constitutions; Missions law-making procedures.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-14

How to Cite

Bagnato, S., & Piccolo, C. (2024). Costituzioni pacifiste e tutela umanitaria: i procedimenti deliberativi delle missioni in Italia, Germania e Giappone attraverso il prisma degli organi costituzionali: Pacifist Constitutions and Humanitarian Protection: law-making procedures for missions in Italy, Germany, and Japan through the prism of constitutional bodies. DPCE Online, 63(SP1). https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2024.2121