Il giudice come legislatore? Lessons (to be) learned from the Bundesverfassungsgericht

Judges as law-makers? Lessons (to be) learned from the Bundesverfassungsgericht

  • Sonja Haberl

Abstract

The present article analyses a long-awaited and much discussed decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court, which in the specific context of the so-called sachgrundlose Befristungen (fixed-term employment contracts with no objective reason for the time limitation) defines both admissibility and limits of judicial law-making (richterliche Rechtsfortbildung or schöpferische Rechtsfindung). In the above decision the Bundesverfassungsgericht scolds the German Federal Labour Court for having “exceeded the limits of reasonable interpretation” with regard to a statutory provision regulating the possibility to use these types of contract. While the Federal Labour Court in the meanwhile has adapted to the new – rather vague – “guidelines” provided by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, these guidelines yet have created great legal uncertainty which most presumably only the legislator will be able to solve.


Keywords: Judicial interpretation; Judicial law-making; Fixed-term employment contracts; Occupational freedom; State duties of protection.

Published
Jan 8, 2020
How to Cite
HABERL, Sonja. Il giudice come legislatore? Lessons (to be) learned from the Bundesverfassungsgericht. DPCE Online, [S.l.], v. 41, n. 4, jan. 2020. ISSN 2037-6677. Available at: <http://www.dpceonline.it/index.php/dpceonline/article/view/833>. Date accessed: 22 may 2022.
Citation Formats